Key takeaways
- A study of 52 horses compared SleipAI with the Lameness Locator, EquiMoves and subjective evaluation. Most discrepancies arose from the thresholds each system imposed, and the strongest agreement was between the Lameness Locator and EquiMoves.
- One study reported excellent agreement between objective parameters and subjective lameness scores (area under the curve 0.87).
- A scoping review of technology to monitor horse behaviour and health lists limits for the Equinosis Q: sensitivity to extreme conditions, complex data management, cost and limited runtime.
- Different systems use different cut-off values, so a result from one system is not directly comparable with another.
Horse owners who want a wearable they can use themselves should look at a saddle-mounted rider-symmetry sensor such as the Equisense Motion One, which tracks symmetry, bounce and rhythm and can flag changes worth raising with a vet, while true lameness measurement with body-mounted inertial sensors, such as the Equinosis Q with Lameness Locator, is sold to veterinarians only, and smartphone-video analysis such as Sleip is aimed mainly at vets as well. No consumer sensor diagnoses lameness, so any change in your horse’s movement still needs a veterinary exam.
This guide draws on maker pages for Equisense, Equinosis and Sleip, plus a scoping review published in ScienceDirect, a PubMed Central comparison of a smartphone method with motion capture, and a field study of 52 horses. Where the sources are manufacturer material, the text says so. Product lines, app plans and regional availability change, so confirm details with the maker before you buy.
Systems at a Glance
| System | Best for | Key stated specs | Limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinosis Q with Lameness Locator | Veterinary lameness workups | Three small wireless inertial sensors (poll, right pastern, top of the hip) linked to a handheld tablet; maker states 200 Hz sampling and submillimetre accuracy; sold only to licensed vets | Not available to owners; a scoping review lists sensitivity to extreme environmental conditions, data management complexity, high cost and limited runtime; maker says it cannot diagnose alone |
| Sleip (smartphone AI gait analysis) | Vets and clinics wanting a markerless method | Uses smartphone video of a trot, no sensors or markers; the maker says it tracks more than 100 anatomical points and measures vertical asymmetry of head, withers and pelvis; results in minutes via cloud processing | Measures asymmetry, not a diagnosis; needs a straight trot of about 30 to 40 metres or a lunge; intended to complement a vet exam |
| Equisense Motion One | Riders who want to track symmetry and training trends | Saddle-mounted sensor; the maker lists symmetry, bounce and cadence; app subscription from a low monthly fee | Rider-oriented, not a diagnostic tool; a consumer-grade device that focuses on wellness monitoring |
| EquiMoves | Vets using multi-sensor gait analysis | Named in the field study as one of the compared systems | Professional system; details not covered in the sources used here |
What “Lameness Sensor” Actually Means
The term covers three different ideas, and mixing them up is the main source of disappointment.
- Veterinary inertial sensor systems. These attach small sensors to the poll, the pastern and the pelvis while the horse trots in a straight line. They measure how far the head and pelvis rise and fall on each side. A literature review reports that the inertial sensor system detected lameness more sensitively than the human eye and that agreement with subjective grading rose with the vet’s experience.
- Markerless video analysis. A phone records the trot and software tracks body points. A peer-reviewed study compared a smartphone method with a 13-camera optical motion-capture system in 25 horses, looking at head and pelvis motion. Sleip says its method is validated against motion capture to a precision of 2 mm, a claim from the maker.
- Rider and saddle sensors. A small device on the saddle measures how the horse moves with a rider. Equisense says its sensor analyses symmetry, bounce and rhythm over time. A user testimonial on the maker’s page describes a drop in trot symmetry that led to finding a foot problem. It is one example, not proof of detection accuracy.
Which Systems Can an Owner Buy?
The Equinosis Q is sold only to licensed registered vets, according to the maker. That makes it a service you receive rather than a gadget you own. If you want objective data, ask your vet whether the clinic uses an inertial sensor or smartphone analysis during a lameness exam. Sleip says regulatory vets in several jurisdictions use its app, and vets use it for follow-ups and rehabilitation monitoring, which suggests clinic-based use. The Equisense Motion One is the product on this list built for riders, with an app subscription listed from a low monthly fee. Consumer-grade devices focus more on wellness than diagnostic accuracy and may miss subtle lameness that professional systems can identify, according to one buyer’s guide.
What the Research Says About Accuracy
- A study of 52 horses compared SleipAI with the Lameness Locator, EquiMoves and subjective evaluation. Most discrepancies arose from the thresholds each system imposed, and the strongest agreement was between the Lameness Locator and EquiMoves.
- One study reported excellent agreement between objective parameters and subjective lameness scores (area under the curve 0.87).
- A scoping review of technology to monitor horse behaviour and health lists limits for the Equinosis Q: sensitivity to extreme conditions, complex data management, cost and limited runtime.
- Different systems use different cut-off values, so a result from one system is not directly comparable with another.
Practical Notes for Owners
- Baselines matter. Sleip describes building a “movement fingerprint” for each horse. Wearables work best when you compare the same horse over time on the same surface with the same rider.
- Surface and rider affect data. Deep footing, tight circles and a rider who sits crookedly can all change symmetry readings.
- Mounting and fit. Saddle sensors depend on a stable saddle fit. A saddle that slips can create false asymmetry.
- Data privacy. Cloud-based analysis uploads video or data. Read the privacy terms.
- Subscriptions. Some apps charge monthly. Check what stops working if you cancel.
- Battery and weather. Check the maker’s stated runtime and operating conditions, especially for winter or hot yards.
Getting Useful Data From Any System
Whatever the technology, the quality of the result depends on how the horse is assessed. Vets generally trot the horse in a straight line on a firm, level surface, because uneven footing and turns introduce movement that is not lameness. Sleip describes recording a straight trot of about 30 to 40 metres, usually twice, or at least 30 seconds on the lunge on both reins. If you are collecting video or sensor data for your vet between visits, copy that approach: same surface, same handler, similar speed, and a calm horse that is not being pulled or hurried.
Keep notes alongside the data. Record shoeing dates, recent work, ground conditions, saddle changes and any known niggles. A change in symmetry that coincides with a new saddle pad or a harder arena may have a simple explanation, while the same change after a stumble in the field may deserve a prompt call. Sharing a short timeline with the vet makes the numbers far easier to interpret.
Finally, remember that objective systems and the human eye can disagree. Studies cited above found that agreement between objective measurements and subjective grades rose with the vet’s experience, and that the thresholds built into each system explain many differences. A borderline reading is a reason to look more closely, not to panic or to ignore a horse that you feel is not right.
Safety and When to Call the Vet
A sensor cannot tell you what is wrong, where the pain is or whether it is safe to ride. Call your vet if your horse is suddenly unsound, has heat or swelling in a limb, is reluctant to bear weight, or shows a change in gait that lasts more than a day or two. Do not use a wearable reading to decide to keep riding a horse that looks lame. The Equinosis maker itself states that its system cannot diagnose lameness independently of a thorough evaluation, and Sleip states it complements a veterinary exam.
Budget Tiers
| Tier | What to expect | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Budget | A rider-focused sensor and a monthly app subscription, wellness-level data | Equisense Motion One |
| Mid-range | Service fee from a clinic using smartphone analysis | Sleip through a vet |
| Premium | Professional sensor systems owned by clinics; cost reflected in exam fees | Equinosis Q with Lameness Locator, EquiMoves |
Pick X If… Decision Table
| If you… | Consider | Why |
|---|---|---|
| want to track symmetry in everyday riding | Equisense Motion One | Built for riders, with symmetry, bounce and cadence metrics |
| suspect lameness and want objective measurements | A vet using Equinosis Q or Sleip | Professional systems with published comparisons |
| are buying a horse and want extra data | Ask the vet about objective gait analysis during the exam | Gives a baseline, though not a guarantee |
| are rehabbing a horse after injury | Vet-led follow-up with Sleip or an inertial system | Sleip lists follow-up and rehabilitation monitoring as a use |
| do not own a recent iPhone | Saddle sensor or vet service | Sleip’s workflow mentions an iPhone with a good camera |
Alternatives Worth Considering
- Regular trot-ups on a flat, hard surface. A free method; film them from the front and rear each month for your own record.
- Lameness exams with a vet. The core of any assessment, including flexion tests and nerve blocks.
- Heart-rate and activity monitors. Useful for fitness, but they do not measure gait symmetry.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a wearable sensor diagnose lameness?
No. Makers of professional systems state that their tools support, rather than replace, a veterinary exam. A sensor measures movement asymmetry, and a vet interprets it alongside the physical examination.
Can I buy the Equinosis Q for myself?
The maker says it is sold only to licensed registered veterinarians. Owners can ask a vet whether their clinic uses it.
Is smartphone gait analysis accurate?
A peer-reviewed study compared a smartphone method with multi-camera motion capture in 25 horses, and Sleip reports validation to 2 mm. A separate 52-horse study found differences between systems largely due to their thresholds. Treat results as one input.
Are rider-symmetry sensors worth it?
They can help you notice trends, like a gradual loss of symmetry on one rein, and prompt an earlier call to the vet. They are not diagnostic, and consumer-grade devices can miss subtle lameness.
How often should I measure my horse?
Consistency matters more than frequency. Many owners record weekly on the same surface and routine, then show any change to their vet.
What if the sensor shows asymmetry but the horse looks sound?
Some horses have natural asymmetry. Note the pattern, watch for repeat changes and ask your vet whether to investigate further.

Write Your Review
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!